Home  ›  What Routing Metric Affects a Path Potential Performance Due to Delay?

What Routing Metric Affects a Path Potential Performance Due to Delay?

Written By Thursday, April 7, 2022 Add Comment Edit

Abstract

Standardized by Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) working grouping, RPL (Routing Protocol for Low Power and Lossy networks) stands as an constructive IPV6 Routing Protocol that establishes a path between any sensor and the sink wich typically collect the information generated past a wireless sensor network. For this purpose, RPL constructs a Destination Oriented Directed Acyclic Graph (DODAG), using an objective office (OF) that implements the metric being used. In particular, RPL supports the bespeak-to-multipoint (P2MP) mode of traffic, and optionally the multipoint-to-indicate (MP2P) and point-to-point traffic ranges. This newspaper evaluates the performance of RPL considering three fundamental parameters: network density, throughput and sink localization. Nosotros farther consider the 3 following metrics: Expected Transmission count (ETX), Hop Count (HC) and Energy. Our simulations reveal that the number of nodes affects the parameters regardless of the scenarios. In improver, the ETX metric performs well in all scenarios in terms of Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR) and Free energy metric, which turns out to have the highest energy consumption with respect to all the implemented scenarios.

References

  1. Zaatouri, I., Ben Fradj Guiloufi, A., Alyaoui, N., Kachouri, A.. (2017). A comparative stdy of the energy effcient clstering protocols in heterogeneos and homogeneos wireless sensor networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 97,6453–6468.

  2. Abuein, Q. Q., Yassein, M. B., Shatnawi, M. Q., Bani-Yaseen, L., Al-Omari, O., Mehdawi, 1000., & Altawssi, H. (2016). Performance evaluation of routing protocol (RPL) for ınternet of things. Performance Evaluation, 7, 17–20.

  3. Lamaazi, H., Benamar, Northward., & Jara, A. J. (2017). RPL-Based Networks in static and mobile surround: a performance assessment analysis. Journal of King Saud University-Figurer and Data Sciences. https://doi.org/ten.1016/j.jksuci.2017.04.001

  4. Zaatouri, I., Lassouaoui, 50., Guiloufi, A. B., Alyaoui, N., Rovedakis, S., Wei, A., & Kachouri, A. (2017). Report of routing metrics for low power and lossy network. In International Conference on Smart, Monitored and Controlled Cities (SM2C), pp. 167–171.

  5. Thomson, C., Wadhaj, I., Romdhani, I., & Al-Dubai, A. Functioning evaluation of RPL metrics in environments with strained transmission ranges. In: 13th International Conference of Computer Systems and Applications (AICCSA), pp 1–viii (2016)

  6. Thubert, P. (2012). Objective function zero for the routing protocol for depression-power and lossy networks (RPL). In: Internet Requests for Comments, IETF, RFC 6552.

  7. Hatem, J. A., Safa, H., & El-Hajj, W. (2017). Enhancing routing protocol for low ability and lossy networks. In 13th ınternational wireless communications and mobile calculating conference (IWCMC), pp. 753–758.

  8. Kamgueu, P. O., Nataf, E., Djotio, T. N., & Festor, O. (2013). Free energy-based metric for the routing protocol in low-ability and lossy network. In SENSORNETS, pp145–148.

  9. Iova, O., Theoleyre, F., & Noel, T. (2014). Improving the network lifetime with energy-balancing routing: Application to RPL. In seventh Wireless and Mobile Networking Conference (WMNC), pp. one–8.

  10. Chang, L. H., Lee, T. H., Chen, South. J., & Liao, C. Y. (2013). Free energy-efficient oriented routing algorithm in wireless sensor networks. In International Briefing on Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), pp. 3813–3818.

  11. Demicheli, F., Ferrari, G., & Gonizzi, P. (2014). Pattern, ımplementation and evaluation of an energy RPL routing metric: Report of an energy efficient routing metric. LAP Lambert Bookish Publishing.

  12. Kamgueu, P. O., Nataf, E., & Djotio, T. N. (2015). On design and deployment of fuzzy-based metric for routing in low-power and lossy networks. In 40th local computer networks briefing workshops (LCN Workshops), pp. 789–795.

  13. Gnawali, O., & Levis, P. (2010) The ETX objective part for RPL. In Cyberspace-Draft.

  14. Gaddour, O., Koubaa, A., Chaudhry, South., Tezeghdanti, M., Chaari, R., & Abid, M. (2012). Simulation and performance evaluation of DAG structure with RPL. In 3rd ınternational conference on communications and networking (ComNet), pp 1–8.

  15. Qasem, Grand., Altawssi, H., Yassien, M. B., & Al-Dubai, A. (2015). Operation evaluation of RPL objective functions. In: International conference on reckoner and ınformation technology; ubiquitous computing and communications; dependable, autonomic and secure computing; pervasive ıntelligence and computing (CIT/IUCC/DASC/PICOM), pp 1606–1613.

  16. Sharma, R., & Jayavignesh, T. (2015). Quantitative analysis and evaluation of RPL with various objective functions for 6LoWPAN. Indian Journal of Science and Technology,viii(19), one.

  17. Wadhaj, I., Kristof, I., Romdhani, I., & Al-Dubai, A. (2015). Performance evaluation of the RPL protocol in fixed and mobile sink low-power and lossy-networks. In International briefing on estimator and ınformation technology; ubiquitous computing and communications; undecayed, autonomic and secure computing; pervasive ıntelligence and computing (CIT/IUCC/DASC/PICOM), pp. 1600–1605.

  18. Barbato, A., Barrano, M., Capone, A., & Figiani, N. (2013). Resource oriented and free energy efficient routing protocol for IPv6 wireless sensor networks. Online Conference on Green Communications (GreenCom), pp. 163–168.

  19. Winter, T. (2012). Rpl: Ipv6 routing protocol for low-power and lossy networks. In Request for Comments 6550.

  20. Gaddour, O., & Koubâa, A. (2012). RPL in a nutshell: A survey. In Computer Networks, pp 3163–3178.

  21. Karkazis, P., Leligou, H. C., Sarakis, L., Zahariadis, T., Trakadas, P., Velivassaki, T. H., & Capsalis, C. (2012). Pattern of primary and composite routing metrics for rpl-compliant wireless sensor networks. In International Briefing on Telecommunications and Multimedia (TEMU), pp. 13–18. https://doi.org/ten.1109/TEMU.2012.6294705

  22. Oliveira, A., & Vazão, T. (2016). Low-power and lossy networks under mobility: A survey. Computer Networks, 107, 339–352.

  23. Gaddour, O., Koubâa, A., & Abid, K. (2015). Quality-of-service aware routing for static and mobile IPv6-based low-ability and lossy sensor networks using RPL. In Advertizing Hoc Networks, pp 233–256.

  24. Ancillotti, East., Bruno, R., & Conti, G. (2012). RPL routing protocol in advanced metering infrastructures: An assay of the unreliability problems. In Sustainable Internet and ICT for Sustainability (SustainIT), pp. 1–x.

  25. Gnawali, O. (2012). The minimum rank with hysteresis objective function. In Internet Requests for Comments, IETF, RFC 6719.

  26. Xiao, West., Liu, J., Jiang, N., & Shi, H. (2014). An optimization of the object part for routing protocol of depression-ability and lossy networks. In 2nd International Conference on Systems and Informatics (ICSAI), pp. 515–519.

  27. Khelifi, N., Oteafy, Southward., Hassanein, H., & Youssef, H. (2015). Proactive maintenance in RPL for 6LowPAN. In International Conference on Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing (IWCMC), pp 993–999.

  28. Ancillotti, East., Bruno, R., & Conti, M. (2014). Reliable data commitment with the ietf routing protocol for low-power and lossy networks. In IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 1864–1877.

Download references

Funding

This research was no financially supported.

Writer information

Affiliations

  1. National Technology School of Gabes, LETI, Gabes, Tunisia

    Ibtissem Zaatouri

  2. National Technology School of Sfax, LETI, Sfax, Tunisia

    Nouha Alyaoui, Awatef Benfradj Guiloufi & Abdennaceur Kachouri

  3. National Conservatory of Arts and Crafts, CEDRIC Laboratory, Paris, French republic

    Francoise Sailhan

Contributions

All authors contributed to the report.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ibtissem Zaatouri.

Ethics declarations

Disharmonize of interest

All the authors declare that they accept no conflict of involvement.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zaatouri, I., Alyaoui, N., Guiloufi, A.B. et al. Design and Performance Analysis of Objective Functions for RPL Routing Protocol. Wireless Pers Commun (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-022-09484-half-dozen

Download citation

  • Accustomed:

  • Published:

  • DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-022-09484-6

Keyword

  • RPL
  • Objective function
  • ETX
  • Hop count
  • Energy

ethridgelattens60.blogspot.com

Source: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11277-022-09484-6

0 Response to "What Routing Metric Affects a Path Potential Performance Due to Delay?"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel